Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
PROBST v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2022cv01986
Plaintiff: JENNIFER M. PROBST
Defendant: ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Type: Labor Labor: Other
PROBST v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 1:2022cv01106
Plaintiff: JENNIFER M. PROBST
Defendant: ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, DAVID A. RICKS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
ASH v. ASH et al
as 1:2021cv02514
Plaintiff: CASSIUS KAZMERE ASH
Defendant: DAEVIDA DANIELLE ASH, STATE OF INDIANA, JOHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Probst v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv00996
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Shyann E. Probst
Not Classified By Court: SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SIMMS v. CORE CIVIC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00774
Defendant: REYNOLDS, CORE CIVIC, PROBST and others
Plaintiff: GONZA SIMMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORROW v. CORE CIVIC et al
as 1:2019cv03955
Defendant: SHAW, CORE CIVIC, PROBST and others
Plaintiff: JEFFERY L. MORROW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Probst v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01823
Defendant: Biomet Inc and Biomet Orthopedics LLC
Plaintiff: Karl Probst
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hilliard et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01685
Plaintiff: Hattie Hilliard , Lennel Addison , Sharon Bennett and others
Defendant: Biomet Inc and Biomet Orthopedics LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PRITT v. ANDERSON et al
as 1:2013cv00708
Defendant: SHERIFF FRANK ANDERSON, WARDEN JEFF CONWAY, MR. DOE and others
Plaintiff: STEVEN W. PRITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00148
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?