Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Pryor et al v. Anderson et al
as 4:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
Judy A. Pryor and Arnold L. Pryor
Defendant:
Daniel D. Anderson and Orthopaedic Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Pryor v. Baptist Health Medical Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00584
Plaintiff:
Paul Pryor
Defendant:
Baptist Health Medical Group, Inc. and Dr. Michael Jason Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Pryor v. Gilley et al
as 6:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
James C. Pryor
Defendant:
J. Gilley, Ms. Landon, Mr. Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Carrasco v. Baum et al
as 3:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Brian R. Carrasco
Defendant:
Bruce Baum, National Union Fire Insurance Company, Gallagher Bassett and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walden v. Pryor
as 5:2018cv00171
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Walden
Defendant:
Lynn Pryor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pryor v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016cv00203
Plaintiff:
Howard Wayne Pryor
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dr. Gary Brown, DMD, PSC v. Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America
as 7:2015cv00050
Plaintiff:
Dr. Gary Brown DMD, PSC and Bryan Pryor
Defendant:
Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America and The Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Forte v. Pryor et al
as 5:2015cv00122
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Joe Forte
Defendant:
Lynn Pryor, Kathy Adams and Michael Cutoff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cherry v. Howie et al
as 5:2014cv00179
Plaintiff:
Ann Cherry
Defendant:
Guy Howie , Jefferson Alexander , Hopkinsville Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
