Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
PRYOR v. BUREAU OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES et al
as 2:2023cv01791
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK D. PRYOR, IV
Defendant:
BUREAU OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES, BOBBI JO SALAMON, KERI MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
PRYOR et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2021cv20100
Plaintiff:
HASSIE PRYOR and TIMOTHY PRYOR
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP and MCKESSON CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ATLANTIC SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. PRYOR et al
as 2:2021cv00637
Defendant:
DEAN PRYOR doing business as HEISE TRANSPORTATION and WILLIAM J. CIKITY
Plaintiff:
ATLANTIC SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PRYOR et al v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. et al
as 2:2021cv02132
Defendant:
"XYZ CORP", MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., "JANE DOE" and others
Plaintiff:
SHELLY PRYOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
TAMARA PRYOR, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv05532
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA AIRPORT, WORLDWIDE FLIGHT SERVICES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
TAMARA PRYOR, and Keisha Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stover v. OMNI Patient Advocates et al
as 1:2020cv02013
Defendant:
Jessica Freedman, Lane Pryor, Todd W. Harrer and others
Plaintiff:
Kurtis D. Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PRYOR v. USA
as 2:2020cv01190
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
ANTHONY PRYOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
