Cases 1 - 10 of 12
First State Insurance Company et al v. Pulmosan Safety Equipment Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv01039
Plaintiff:
First State Insurance Company and New England Reinsurance Corporation
Defendant:
Pulmosan Safety Equipment Corporation, Vickie Bell , Phillip B. Bell, Jr. and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Vickie Bell , Jonathan Bell and Phillip B. Bell, Jr.
Thirdparty_defendant:
First State Insurance Company , New England Reinsurance Corporation , Pulmosan Safety Equipment Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Vickie Bell , Jonathan Bell and Phillip B. Bell, Jr.
Cross_defendant:
First State Insurance Company , New England Reinsurance Corporation and Pulmosan Safety Equipment Corporation
Counter_claimant:
Vickie Bell , Jonathan Bell and Phillip B. Bell, Jr.
Counter_defendant:
First State Insurance Company , New England Reinsurance Corporation and Pulmosan Safety Equipment Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vickie Bell, et al v. Pulmosan Safety Equipment Corp, et al
as 17-1051
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Vickie Bell, Phillip B. Bell, Jr. and Johnathan Bell
Defendant - Appellant:
Pulmosan Safety Equipment Corporation
Defendant:
Ruemelin Manufacturing Company, Inc., Mine Safety Appliances Company, Clemco Industries, Inc. and others
Bell et al v. Mine Safety Appliances Company et al
as 1:2013cv01075
Plaintiff:
Vickie Bell , Phillip B. Bell, Jr. and Jonathan Bell
Defendant:
Mine Safety Appliances Company, Ruemelin Manufacturing Company, Inc., Pulmosan Safety Equipment Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POGGIOLI et al v. A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv80099
Plaintiff:
THERESA C. POGGIOLI, MARTHA C. SPALDING, DORIS STALLARD and others
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AGL WELDING SUPPLY CO., INC., ALFA LAVAL,INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
POGGIOLI et al v. A.J. FRIEDMAN SUPPY CO., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv00504
Plaintiff:
THERESA C. POGGIOLI, MARTHA C. SPALDING and DORIS STALLARD
Defendant:
A.J. FRIEDMAN SUPPY CO., INC., A.J. MCNEIL CO.,INC., A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LEZOTTE v. CONGOLEUM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv86988
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., AEARO COMPANY, CONTINENTAL BEVERAGE PACKAGING, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ALICE LEZOTTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Bee McClain, et al v. Air Liquide America, et al
as 2:2003cv00473
Plaintiff:
Bee McClain, et al
Cross Defendant:
Air Liquide America
Defendant:
Vulcan Materials Com, Green Brothers Gravel Company, Clark Sand Company, Inc and others
Cross Claimant:
Quikrete Companies, Inc. and Sammons BW, Inc. f/k/a Briggs-Weaver, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Martin, et al v. Air Liquide America, et al
as 2:2003cv00471
Plaintiff:
Robert Martin, et al
Cross Defendant:
Air Liquide America Corporation
Defendant:
Clark Sales and Rentals, Inc., Clark Sand Company, Inc, Clemco Industries Corporation and others
Cross Claimant:
Quikrete Materials, Inc. and Sammons BW, Inc. f/k/a Briggs-Weaver, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Gary, et al v. Air Liquide America, et al
as 2:2003cv00381
Plaintiff:
Joe Gary, et al
Cross Defendant:
Air Liquide America Corporation
Defendant:
American Sand and Gravel Company, Baroid Drilling Fluids, Inc., Big Three Industries Inc and others
Cross Claimant:
Quickrete Materials and Sammons BW, Inc. f/k/a Briggs-Weaver, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
King, et al, et al v. Air Liquide America, et al
as 2:2003cv00383
Plaintiff:
Cornelius King, et al, James Anderson, Terry Carpenter and others
Cross Defendant:
Air Liquide America Corporation
Defendant:
American Sand and Gravel Company, Baroid Drilling Fluids, Inc., Big Three Industries Inc and others
Cross Claimant:
Sammons BW, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
