Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Dicicco v. PVH Corporation
as 1:2019cv11092
Defendant:
PVH Corporation
Plaintiff:
Robert Dicicco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr
Tripicchio v. PVH Corporation
as 1:2019cv06147
Plaintiff:
Vincent Tripicchio
Defendant:
PVH Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tripicchio v. PVH Corporation
as 1:2019cv05729
Plaintiff:
Vincent Tripicchio
Defendant:
PVH Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr
Ramos v. PVH Corporation
as 2:2016cv02258
Plaintiff:
Maria Ramos
Defendant:
PVH Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramos v. PVH Corporation
as 4:2016cv04131
Plaintiff:
Maria Ramos
Defendant:
PVH Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Icon Laser Solutions LLC v. PVH Corporation
as 3:2015cv03320
Plaintiff:
Icon Laser Solutions LLC
Defendant:
PVH Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Rodriguez v. Calvin Klein, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02590
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Rodriguez
Defendant:
Calvin Klein, Inc. and PVH Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Chavez v. PVH Corporation
as 5:2013cv01797
Plaintiff:
Jessie Chavez
Defendant:
PVH Corporation, PVH Retail Stores, LLC and Tommy Hilfiger Retail, LLC
Petitioner:
Melissa Wiggs, Jodi Scott-George and ADP, LLC
Interested Party:
Jeffrey Lapan and Ashwin Chandra
Not Classified By Court:
Danah Lapan, Dakkar Hunter, Bryan Noriega and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Scott-George v. PVH Corporation
as 2:2013cv00441
Defendant:
PVH Corporation, Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation and PVH Retail Stores, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jodi Scott-George and Melissa Wiggs
Not Classified By Court:
Rust Consulting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00974
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Uniform Services Employment and Reemployment Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
