Cases 1 - 10 of 66
SU v. LIM PR CLEANING SERVICES et al
as 2:2024mc00214
Respondent:
JUAN E. ALONSO, LIM PR CLEANING SERVICES and ALONSO PACHECO
Petitioner:
JULIE A. SU
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Pacheco v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv02078
Plaintiff:
Damarys Pacheco
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Baker v. Pacheco et al
as 1:2023cv01410
Plaintiff:
Terrence S. Baker
Defendant:
Candis Pacheco, Steve Barndt, Clarissa Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
PACHECO-FIGUEROA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv04113
Plaintiff:
JAIME PACHECO-FIGUEROA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
YODER et al v. CONAWAY RACING & TRUCKING, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv03657
Plaintiff:
JACOB YODER, SHAWN YODER and NATASHA YODER
Defendant:
CONAWAY RACING & TRUCKING, LLC, AARON J PACHECO, BUILDERS FIRSTSOURCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
SEGARRA-PACHECO v. SAUL
as 5:2021cv00220
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
DAMARYS RAQUEL SEGARRA-PACHECO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SEGARRA-PACHECO v. SAUL
as 2:2021cv00220
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
DAMARYS RAQUEL SEGARRA-PACHECO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PACHECO v. WALMART INC. et al
as 5:2020cv03925
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, WALMART INC. and WAL-MART STORES EAST, INC.
Plaintiff:
MYRIAN VASQUEZ PACHECO and MYRIAN VAZQUEZ PACHECO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv03210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
WHITFIELD v. DUCKERY et al
as 2:2018cv01216
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL WHITFIELD
Defendant:
TRACEY DUCKERY , YVONNE SCOTT, PH.D. , EMILIO PACHECO REYES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
