Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Space Exploration Technologies Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board et al
as 2:2024cv01352
Plaintiff:
Space Exploration Technologies Corp
Defendant:
National Labor Relations Board, Jennifer Abruzzo, Lauren M McFerran and others
Intervenor:
Tom Moline, Deborah Lawrence, Scott Beck and others
Amicus Curiae:
Pacific Legal Foundation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Space Exploration Technologies Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
Defendant:
National Labor Relations Board, Jennifer Abruzzo, Lauren M McFerran and others
Intervenor:
Tom Moline, Deborah Lawrence, Scott Beck and others
Amicus Curiae:
Pacific Legal Foundation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Johnson, et al v. Smith
as 23-3091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT JOHNSON, HARLENE HOYT and COVEY FIND KENNEL, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
JUSTIN SMITH, D.V.M., in his official capacity as Animal Health Commissioner at the Kansas Department of Agriculture
Amicus Curiae:
THE BUCKEYE INSTITUTE, PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION and NEW CIVIL LIBERTIES ALLIANCE
Brooke Henderson, et al v. Springfield R-12 School District, et al
as 23-1880
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brooke Henderson and Jennifer Lumley
Defendant / Appellee:
Springfield R-12 School District, Board of Education, of the Springfield R-12 School District, Grenita Lathan and others
Defendant:
Martha Doenning
Appellant:
Americans for Prosperity Foundation, Alliance Defending Freedom, Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression and others
Lucid Group USA, Inc. v. Johnston et al
as 1:2022cv01116
Plaintiff:
Lucid Group USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Monique Johnston, Daniel Avitia and Corrie Thompson
Amicus Curiae:
Pacific Legal Foundation, Professor Daniel Crane and Americans For Prosperity Foundation
Petitioner:
Texas Automobile Dealers Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
In re: Washington Cattlemen's Association, et al v. USDC-CAOAK
as 22-70194
Not Classified By Court:
In re: WASHINGTON CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCAITION, PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Petitioner:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
ALDF v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16097
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
ALDF v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16098
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
WASHINGTON CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCIATION, PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION and others
ALDF v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16100
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16092
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, SIERRA CLUB and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
