Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Spoors #731272 v. Kent County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
LaTanya Spoors #731272
Defendant:
Kent County Correctional Facility, Unknown Schafer, Vital Core Health Strategies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Fender et al
as 1:2022cv01372
Plaintiff:
Todd A. King
Defendant:
Warden Warden Fender, Assistant Warden Ms King, Unit Manager Padilla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Padilla et al
as 1:2022cv01234
Plaintiff:
Ashunte Smith
Defendant:
Damian Padilla, S. Mazza, Tonya Bowser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greiner v. Oceana, County of, et al
as 1:2019cv00936
Defendant:
Treven Padilla, Louis Herremans, Oceana, County of and others
Plaintiff:
Jared T. Greiner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2016cv00073
Plaintiff:
Darrell L. Miles
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, Randy White , Steve Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heriberto Padilla v. Charlotte Jenkin
as 16-3322
Petitioner - Appellant:
HERIBERTO PADILLA
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLOTTE JENKINS
Padilla v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 1:2015cv00448
Petitioner:
Heriberto Padilla
Respondent:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Porter v. Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government et al
as 3:2013cv00923
Plaintiff:
Antwain Rashawn Porter
Defendant:
Louisville Jefferson County Metro Government, City of Louisville, Louisville Metropolitan Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Padilla v. Pugh et al
as 4:2012cv00919
Plaintiff:
Mauro Padilla
Defendant:
Michael Pugh, Correction Corporation of America and Northeast Ohio Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
