Cases 1 - 10 of 22
VICTORIA v. ANDERSON et al
as 2:2023cv03765
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS VICTORIA
Defendant:
JOSHUA ANDERSON, TAAL HARRIS, SALVATORE PALMIERI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
MOSLEY v. TEN PENN CENTER et al
as 2:2023cv00813
Plaintiff:
JAMES MOSLEY
Defendant:
TEN PENN CENTER, TEN PENN CENTER ASSOCIATES, SAP V. TENN PENN CENTER NFG LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01433
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
BETHEA v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2020cv12702
Defendant:
S.C.P.O. E. DURKOT, S.C.P.O. A. NARULA, S.C.P.O. K. RAMIREZ and others
Plaintiff:
DEVONTA BETHEA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
PALMIERI v. LAZER SPOT, INC.
as 3:2020cv08167
Plaintiff:
JOHN PALMIERI
Defendant:
LAZER SPOT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
PALMIERI v. INTERVET INC.
as 2:2019cv22024
Plaintiff:
Valerie Palmieri
Defendant:
INTERVET INC. a/k/a MERCK ANIMAL HEALTH and INTERVET INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FELD et al v. THE CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2019cv12428
Defendant:
JOSEPH N. DIVINCENZO, JR., WEEQUAHIC PRESERVATION LLC, DANIELLE SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
EPSTIEN HARDWARE CO., REASONABLE LOCK & SAFE CO., THE FOUR FELDS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00387
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
