Cases 21 - 30 of 92
v. Innovative Sports Management, Inc. d/b/a Integrated Sports Media et al
as 2:2019cv08731
Defendant:
Catherine I Palomino, Nestor Eduardo Manrique and Innovative Sports Management, Inc. d/b/a Integrated Sports Media
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Nestor Eduardo Manrique et al
as 2:2019cv08733
Defendant:
Catherine I Palomino, Nestor Eduardo Manrique, Nestor Eduardo Manrique individually doing business as Pisco Sour Market and others
Plaintiff:
Innovative Sports Management, Inc. d/b/a Integrated Sports Media, Innovative Sports Management, Inc. and Innovative Sports Management, Inc. doing business as Integrated Sports Media
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521
(PC) Chavez v. Brown et al
as 1:2019cv00410
Defendant:
C. Pfieffer, R. Magana, L. Moreno and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Chavez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavez v. Brown et al
as 5:2018cv07049
Defendant:
C. Pfieffer, R. Magana, Edmond G. Brown, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Chavez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02011
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Alan Palomino v. City of Anaheim et al
as 8:2018cv01498
Defendant:
Does 1-10, inclusive, City of Anaheim and Officer Jason Smith
Plaintiff:
Alan Palomino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01726
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Richard Palomino v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 2:2018cv05897
Plaintiff:
Richard Palomino
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Palomino v. Mindoro
as 3:2018cv02359
Plaintiff:
Samuel Daniel Palomino
Defendant:
Michael K. Mindoro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuel Daniel Palomino v. John Doe 1 et al
as 2:2018cv00081
Defendant:
Nachet M. Harris, John Doe No. 1, John Doe No. 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Daniel Palomino
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
