Cases 21 - 26 of 26
WANING v. PAN AM RAILWAYS INC
as 1:2009cv00332
Plaintiff:
KENNETH B WANING
Defendant:
PAN AM RAILWAYS INC and SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Horizon Milling, LLC v. Pan Am Railways, inc. et al
as 1:2008cv11747
Plaintiff:
Horizon Milling, LLC
Defendant:
Pan Am Railways, inc. and Springfield Terminal Railway Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
First Union Rail Corporation v. Springfield Terminal Railway Company et al
as 3:2008cv00230
Plaintiff:
First Union Rail Corporation
Defendant:
Springfield Terminal Railway Company, Portland Terminal Company, Maine Central Railroad Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
New England Southern Railroad Co. v. Springfield Terminal Railway, Co. et al
as 1:2007cv00403
Plaintiff:
New England Southern Railroad Co. and New England Southern Railroad Co.
Defendant:
Boston and Maine Corporation, Springfield Terminal Railway, Co. and Pan Am Railways, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Interstate Commerce Act
CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY v. BARRETT PAVING MATERIALS INC et al
as 1:2007cv00113
Plaintiff:
FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
Defendant:
PAN AM RAILWAYS INC , MAINE CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY and UGI UTILITIES INC
Counter_claimant:
UGI UTILITIES INC , PAN AM RAILWAYS INC and MAINE CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
Counter_defendant:
FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
Thirdparty_defendant:
CITY OF BANGOR , NORMAN HEITMANN and EDWARD BARRETT
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
PAN AM RAILWAYS INC and MAINE CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv10055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
