Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Soloman v. Cardenas et.al.
as 3:2023cv02044
Plaintiff:
Nebiyu Shefrew Soloman
Defendant:
Rachel Cardenas, Parnow, City of Petaluma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Geiken v. Patel et al
as 3:2022cv50442
Plaintiff:
Timothy Roy Geiken
Defendant:
Satish Patel, Shannie, Andrew Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shah El v. Frazier et al
as 3:2022cv50387
Plaintiff:
Cecil Shah El
Defendant:
Makala Frazier, Brad Cars, Lance Reinbolz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elliott v. DeKalb County Jail et al
as 3:2022cv50291
Plaintiff:
Brendan George Elliott
Defendant:
DeKalb County Jail, Andrew Sullivan, Rodger Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maze II v. Reed et al
as 3:2022cv50037
Plaintiff:
Sheldon A. Maze II
Defendant:
J. Reed, R. Tyler, R. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Redmond v. Scott et al
as 1:2018cv00031
Plaintiff:
Darrin Redmond
Defendant:
Tyler Scott, T.R. Smith, Carolin Parnow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
K.P. v. Peach Tree Healthcare et al
as 2:2017cv02130
Plaintiff:
K.P. and Keri Parnow
Defendant:
Peach Tree Healthcare , Peach Tree Linda , Kenneth Forsythe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barksdale v. Scott et al
as 1:2017cv05463
Plaintiff:
Paul Keith Barksdale
Defendant:
Roger Scott, DeKalb County Sheriff's Dept., Jeremy Grubbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barksdale v. Scott et al
as 1:2017cv00096
Plaintiff:
Paul Keith Barksdale
Defendant:
Roger Scott, DeKalb County Sheriff's Dept., Jeremy Grubbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. DeKalb County Jail Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv50352
Plaintiff:
DeWayne A. Jones
Defendant:
DeKalb County Jail Corporation, Roger A. Scott, Parnow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
