Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Braxton et al v. Apperson, Crump & Maxwell, PLLC et al
as 2:2012cv02761
Defendant:
Apperson, Crump & Maxwell, P.L.C., Robert Dinkelspiel, Robert Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Vivian Braxton , Otis Braxton and Pee Wee Wisdom Child Development Center, Inc.
Receiver:
Robert Dinkelspiel
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Braxton et al v. Apperson, Crump & Maxwell, P.L.C. et al
as 2:2012cv02751
Defendant:
Apperson, Crump & Maxwell, P.L.C., Robert Dinkelspiel, Robert Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Vivian Braxton, Otis Braxton and Pee Wee Wisdom Child Development Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Partee v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp21773
Plaintiff:
Patricia Partee
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Partee et al v. Farmers Insurance Group
as 2:2010cv02434
Plaintiff:
Robert Partee and Glenda Partee
Defendant:
Farmers Insurance Group
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
John Partee, et al v. Tommy Callahan, et al
as 10-5591
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN PARTEE and FANNIE PARTEE, husband and wife
Defendant - Appellee:
TOMMY L. CALLAHAN, individually and in his capacity as an officer or agent of the Memphis Police Department and CITY OF MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Partee v. Fortner
as 3:2009cv00409
Petitioner:
John Willie Partee
Respondent:
James Fortner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Partee v. Fortner
as 1:2009cv00038
Petitioner:
John Willie Partee
Respondent:
James Fortner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Michael Flowers
as 09-5500
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL FLOWERS, aka Michael Partee
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
