Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Arogant Hollywood et al v. City of South Pasadena et al
as 2:2017cv05919
Defendant:
City of South Pasadena, City of South Pasadena Public Library, Colantuono, Highsmith and Whatley, PC and others
Plaintiff:
Alison Helen Fairchild and Arogant Hollywood
Jeffrey Parcell v. City of Pasadena et al
as 2:2017cv01786
Defendant:
Ralph Chapman, Ralph Chapman, City of Pasadena and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Parcell
Phinney v. Pasadena Police Department et al
as 4:2016cv03105
Plaintiff:
William E Phinney
Defendant:
Pasadena Police Department, Biggs, Unknown Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michelle D. Rodgers et al v. City of Pasadena et al
as 2:2016cv03616
Defendant:
Sgt. Michael Bugh, City of Pasadena, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Selah Chavet and Michelle D. Rodgers
#1600:
Officer Crawford
#3301:
Officer A. Gonzalez
#5266:
Officer Lewis
#8305:
Officer Tavera
Samuel Mayo v. Pasadena Police Department, et al
as 15-20498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL MAYO
Defendant - Appellee:
PASADENA POLICE DEPARTMENT and HARRIS COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT
Guy J. Lombardo v. Alhambra Police Department et al
as 2:2015cv06262
Plaintiff:
Guy J. Lombardo
Defendant:
Alhambra Police Department, Pasadena Police Department, San Dimas Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lisa Tucker v. City of Pasadena et al
as 2:2015cv00726
Defendant:
City of Pasadena, Does, Officer Kathryn Jorge and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Tucker
Arthur D Townsend v. Pasadena Police Department et al
as 2:2015cv00040
Defendant:
Jose Banuelos, David Been, James Deal and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur DeWayne Townsend
Joseph Woods v. City of Pasadena et al
as 2:2014cv08679
Defendant:
City of Irvine, City of Pasadena, Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Woods
Mitchell v. Pasadena Police Department
as 4:2014mc01192
Plaintiff:
Almond Mitchell
Defendant:
Pasadena Police Department
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
