Cases 1 - 10 of 11
David Meyers v. Dean Locklear
as 23-7167
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, WILLIAM BULLARD, LIEUTENANT BARNES and others
David Meyers v. Dean Locklear
as 23-6035
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, WILLIAM BULLARD, LIEUTENANT BARNES and others
v. VEREEN et al
as 1:2022cv00663
Plaintiff:
BILAL RASUL
Defendant:
DARREN VEREEN, SPEPHEN OJO, TIMOTHY CISCEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas Symmes, Jr. v. Capt. Covington
as 21-7438
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPT. COVINGTON, JERRY INGRAM, JR., KATY POOLE and others
James McNeill v. Lt. Crystal Taylor
as 21-7168
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES C. MCNEILL
Defendant / Appellee:
LT. TAYLOR, PATRICIA ALSTON, MONICA BOND and others
Terrance James-Bey v. NC Dept. of Public Safety
as 19-7093
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICIA ALSTON, KIMBERLY D. GRANDE, MONICA BOND and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRANCE L. JAMES-BEY, a/k/a Terrance Lamount James, a/k/a T. L. James-Bey
James-Bey v. NC Department of Public Safety et al
as 5:2018ct03349
Defendant:
NC Department of Public Safety, Katina Jordan, Ms. Copple and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance Lamount James-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNeill v. Taylor et al
as 5:2018ct03225
Defendant:
Lt. Crystal Taylor, Monica Bond, Patricia Alston and others
Plaintiff:
James C. McNeill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William C. Carawan, Jr. v. John McLarty
as 17-6353
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM CARAWAN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN MCLARTY, RONALD MAYES, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SLEDGE and others
Terry v. Jenkins et al
as 5:2016ct03032
Plaintiff:
Christopher Donnell Terry, Jr.
Defendant:
B. Jenkins, Daniel Brame, Patricia Alston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
