Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-6032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jackson et al v. Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00226
Plaintiff:
Gerald Jackson , Tawanda Jackson , Bernadette Landry and others
Defendant:
Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company, LLC, Coachmen Industries, Inc. and Bechtel National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson et al v. Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00565
Plaintiff:
Gerald Jackson , All Plaintiffs , Tawanda Jackson and others
Defendant:
Coachmen Recreational Vehicle Company, LLC, Coachmen Industries, Inc. and Bechtel National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richard Cantrell et al v. Plus Management, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv03466
Plaintiff:
Patricia Cantrell and Richard Cantrell
Defendant:
Does, Plus Management, Inc. and Hah Seong Song
Richard Cantrell et al v. Active USA, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00137
Defendant:
Active USA, Inc. and DOES
Plaintiff:
Patricia Cantrell and Richard Cantrell
Plus Management, Inc. v. Richard Cantrell et al
as 2:2009cv02511
Plaintiff:
Plus Management, Inc., Plus Management, Inc., Plus Management, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Richard Cantrell, Patricia Cantrell and DOES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Cantrell et al v. Creamer et al
as 1:2007cv00158
Plaintiff:
Patricia Cantrell and David Cantrell
Defendant:
Keith Creamer, Gregory Bosserman, Gregory Bosserman and others
Cross Claimant:
Temp Distribution of Maryland, Inc., Keith Creamer and Gregory Bosserman
Cross Defendant:
Keith Creamer, Gregory Bosserman, Gregory Bosserman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
