Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Spigner et al v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 9:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
Colomba Spigner
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Nassau Health Care Corporation, Nassau County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spigner et al v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 2:2023cv08741
Plaintiff:
Colomba Spigner
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Nassau Health Care Corporation, Nassau County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salvana v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 5:2021cv00735
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Betty M. Parkmond, R.N., David S. Dinello, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael F. Salvana, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bietz et al v. City of Niagara Falls et al
as 1:2020cv00138
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lee George, Charles Brundidge, Jr., James L. Dolson and others
Defendant:
Miller Springs Remediation Management, Inc., Occidental Chemical Corporation, Sevenson Environmental Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Cole v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 9:2014cv00539
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Cole
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Anthony J. Annucci, Albert Prack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pratt et al v. Indian River Central School District et al
as 7:2009cv00411
Plaintiff:
Charles Patrick Pratt, Charles Patrick Pratt, A.E.P. and others
Defendant:
Indian River Central School District, Indian River Central School District Board of Education, James Kettrick and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
