Cases 1 - 10 of 32
HALL v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2023cv00773
Petitioner:
Carlese J. Hall
Respondent:
Charles Williams, Arcola Washington-Adduci, Patricia V Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kasali v. Bradley
as 7:2023cv00080
Petitioner:
Lola Shalewa Barbara Kasali
Respondent:
Warden Patricia V. Bradley, Kimberly Neely, Michael Carvajal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kasali v. Bradley
as 4:2022cv04497
Petitioner:
Lola Shalewa Barbara Kasali
Respondent:
Warden Patricia V. Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HALL v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2022cv03605
Plaintiff:
CARLESE J. HALL
Defendant:
CHARLES WILLIAMS, ARCOLA WASHINGTON-ADDUCI, PATRICIA V. BRADLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John William Butler III v. Jaspal Dhaliwal et al
as 2:2021cv05778
Plaintiff:
John William Butler, III
Defendant:
Jaspal Dhaliwal, William Watson, Galyna Mishchenko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruce R. Sands v. Patricia V. Bradley
as 2:2021cv01114
Respondent:
Patricia V. Bradley
Petitioner:
Bruce R. Sands, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Robert C. Butler v. Patricia V. Bradley et al
as 2:2020cv11211
Respondent:
Patricia V. Bradley and Michael D. Carvajal
Petitioner:
Robert C. Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McGuire-Mollica v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, The et al
as 7:2020cv01768
Defendant:
Chad Garrett, Medley, Shoulders and others
Plaintiff:
Terri McGuire-Mollica
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGuire-Mollica v. Bradley
as 7:2020cv01672
Respondent:
Patricia V Bradley
Petitioner:
Terri McGuire-Mollica
Defendant:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Woods v. Bradley
as 7:2020cv01631
Petitioner:
Erin Woods
Respondent:
Patricia V Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
