Cases 1 - 10 of 103
State of Florida v. Jones
as 8:2024cv00833
Plaintiff:
State of Florida
Defendant:
Patrick Dwyon Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 Notice of Removal-Criminal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04869
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patrick Jones v. David Ramos, et al
as 23-11823
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK DWYON JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID RAMOS, RODGER BERLYNE, PATRIENA SENITA ALLEN and others
Jones v. Ramos et al
as 5:2022cv00482
Plaintiff:
Patrick Dwyon Jones
Defendant:
David Ramos, FNU Berlyne, Patriena Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emanger GilbertIn re: Emanger Gilbert
as 22-11587
Petitioner:
In re: EMANGER L. GILBERT
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA, JOSEPH H. HEADLEY, Warden III, JIMMY K. MOULTON, Cir. Judge and others
In re: Emanger Gilbert
as 22-11031
Petitioner:
In re: EMANGER L. GILBERT
Respondent:
JOSEPH H. HEADLEY, Warden III, JIMMY K. MOULTON, Cir. Judge, PATRICK B. JONES, III, Prosecutor and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv87484
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICK WAYNE JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv53573
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICK WALTER JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
