Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Williams v. Helena-West Helena Arkansas, City of et al
as 2:2019cv00006
Defendant:
Christopher Franklin, James Patrick Smith, John H Huff, Jr and others
Plaintiff:
Sandy Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01976
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
Kenneth Camp, et al v. City of Pelham
as 14-14804
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KENNETH CAMP, MICHAEL TODD MCCARVER, PATRICK SMITH and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF PELHAM
Stocks et al v. Gullicksrud et al
as 1:2013cv01141
Defendant:
City of Aurora, Daniel J. Oates, Bradley Gullicksrud and others
Plaintiff:
Michelle Stocks and Thomas Stocks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hudgins v. Carribbean Spotlight Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv05310
Defendant:
P.O. Jamayne Anthony, Keith Bey, Carribbean Spotlight Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Avagal Hudgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Delatorres v. Caribbean Spotlight Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01244
Defendant:
Caribbean Spotlight Inc., John and Jane Does 1-10 et al., Jude Louis-Jean and others
Plaintiff:
Tiesha Delatorres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dowling v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv00998
Defendant:
C.O. John/Jane Doe #1-10, Det. Gasser, Det. Harman and others
Plaintiff:
Lanell Dowling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00023
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Lee et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv04839
Defendant:
David Bethelmy, Janell P. Bethelmy, Joan C. Bethelmy and others
Plaintiff:
Sharif Lee and Cyprian Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
