Cases 1 - 8 of 8
PATRONSKI v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv54496
Plaintiff:
JOHN PATRONSKI
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Signorelli et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2019cv18980
Plaintiff:
Mary Signorelli and THE ESTATE OF NELLIE A. PATRONSKI
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Signorelli v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2019cv01302
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Mary Signorelli, Individually and as Executor of the Estate of Nellie A. Patronski (Deceased) and Mary Signorelli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abreu v. Dinello
as 18-1572
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carlos Abreu
Def-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Maximillian, Dr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Dr. Dinello, Nurse L. Young, DSA A. Lamanna and others
Abreu v. Dinello et al
as 6:2017cv06401
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant:
Dinello, L. Young, A. Lamanna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abreu v. Bruen et al
as 6:2017cv06394
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant:
Kevin Bruen, Nancy J. Heywood, John C. Colvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marjory Regan v. United State
as 12-2484
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARJORY WAGNER REGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary, Department of Veteran Affairs, WILLIAM FEELEY, Director, Buffalo VA Medical Center and others
Regan v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 5:2011cv00422
Plaintiff:
Marjory Wagner Regan
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Eric K. Shinseki, William Feeley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
