Cases 1 - 10 of 4,647
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00722
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Tenney v. Edger et al
as 1:2024cv00820
Plaintiff:
Sherry Tenney
Defendant:
Paul Edger, Mia Paone, Sarah Frasch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Muhammad v. Monk et al
as 1:2024cv00789
Plaintiff:
Walid A. Muhammad
Defendant:
Albert Monk, Gwen Wynn, Jack Cronin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARNELL v. CVS PHARMACY, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01960
Plaintiff:
PAUL PARNELL
Defendant:
CVS PHARMACY, INC. and PENNSYLVANIA CVS PHARMACY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
COHEN V. COMM OF PA
as 5:2024cv01987
Plaintiff:
PAUL COHEN
Defendant:
COMM OF PA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRESSWELL v. ACKER et al
as 2:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH PAUL CRESSWELL
Defendant:
PETER C. ACKER, TIM McGONICAL, DANIEL P. WALLACE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lisenby v. OLYMPUS CORPORATION OF THE AMERICAS et al
as 5:2024cv01803
Plaintiff:
Paul Lisenby
Defendant:
OLYMPUS CORPORATION OF THE AMERICAS, OLYMPUS AMERICA INC. and GYRUS ACMI, INC.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
ALKHATIB v. RICHARDS et al
as 3:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
LATIF ALKHATIB
Defendant:
M. RICHARDS, E. BROWN, R. WESTOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
West-Bogans v. Guido et al
as 1:2024cv00717
Plaintiff:
Angela West-Bogans and Angela West
Defendant:
Judge Edward Guido, Judge Claudia Brewbaker, Judge Albert Masland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
