Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Rosberg v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Rosberg
Defendant:
State of Nebraska, Paul A. Vaughn, James Kube and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Paul Rosberg v. Mark Johnson, et al
as 23-3653
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Paul A. Rosberg
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant / Appellee:
Mark Johnson, Chancery Court Judge for the District of Nebraska and Robert B. Evnen, Secretary of State of Nebraska
Rosberg et al v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Rosberg, John Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant:
State of Nebraska, Paul A. Vaughn, James Kube and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rosberg et al v. Johnson et al
as 8:2022cv00384
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Rosberg, John Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant:
Mark Johnson and Robert Evnen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rosberg v. Rosberg et al
as 8:2021cv00152
Defendant:
State of Nebraska, James Kube and Kelly R. Rosberg
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Rosberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00463
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Rosberg v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2017cv00080
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Rosberg
Defendant:
State of Nebraska and Paul J. Vaughan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rosberg v. Sands et al
as 4:2015cv04080
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Rosberg
Defendant:
Joseph Sands, Christopher A. Mihalo, Kelly R. Rosberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rosberg v. Willis
as 4:2015cv04074
Petitioner:
Paul A. Rosberg
Respondent:
J.S. Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rosberg v. Riesberg et al
as 4:2015cv04079
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Rosberg
Defendant:
Karen Riesberg, Knox County, Bonding Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
