Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Eidam #266232 v. Berrien, County of et al
as 1:2011cv00107
Plaintiff:
Jason Richard Eidam #266232
Defendant:
Berrien, County of, L. Paul Bailey, Kevin Allred and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jason Eidam v. Berrien County Jail, et al
as 10-2635
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON RICHARD EIDAM
Defendant:
BERRIEN COUNTY JAIL and JIM HALL, Deputy, in his official and personal capacities
Defendant - Appellee:
L. PAUL BAILEY, Sheriff, in his official and personal capacaities and KEVIN ALLRED, Lt., in his official and personal capacities
Jason Eidam v. Berrien County Jail, et al
as 10-2561
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON RICHARD EIDAM
Defendant:
BERRIEN COUNTY JAIL and JIM HALL, Deputy, in his official and personal capacities
Defendant - Appellee:
L. PAUL BAILEY, Sheriff, in his official and personal capacaities and KEVIN ALLRED, Lt., in his official and personal capacities
Price #709652 v. Lighthart et al
as 1:2010cv00265
Plaintiff:
RonRicco Price #709652
Defendant:
D. Lighthart and L. Paul Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eidam #266232 v. Berrien County Jail et al
as 1:2010cv00034
Plaintiff:
Jason Richard Eidam #266232
Defendant:
Berrien County Jail, Paul Bailey, Kevin Allred and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. MR. MICHAEL ZENK et al
as 3:2009cv00254
Petitioner:
PAUL BAILEY
Respondent:
MR. MICHAEL ZENK, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and CORNELL COMPANIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Price v. Bailey et al
as 1:2009cv00012
Plaintiff:
Ronricco Price
Defendant:
L. Paul Bailey and Berrien County Jail
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jackson #282320 v. Ward et al
as 1:2008cv00996
Plaintiff:
Curtis O. Jackson #282320
Defendant:
L. Paul Bailey, Stacey Ward, Corey Burks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
