Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Brenda Brown v. James Brown, et al
as 13-5806
Debtor:
In re: BRENDA KAY BROWN
Appellant:
BRENDA KAY BROWN
Appellee:
JAMES A. BROWN, PAUL BROWN, RICHARD M. WEHRLE and others
Hester v. E-Loan Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00283
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Hester
Defendant:
E-Loan Inc., Paul Brown, Mike Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Other Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2012cv00120
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2012cv00110
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Paul Brown, et al v. Cassens Transport Co., et al
as 10-2334
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL BROWN, WILLIAM FANALY, CHARLES THOMAS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CASSENS TRANSPORT CO., CRAWFORD & COMPANY and SAUL MARGULES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-3905
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Martin v. McLean et al
as 2:2009cv12888
Defendant:
Michael McLean, Enrique Sierra, Paul Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Darrin Anthony Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Type:
Civil Rights
Paul Brown v. Ernie Moore
as 09-3260
Petitioner - Appellant:
PAUL BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
ERNIE MOORE, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Boards of Trustees of The Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs v. Expert Masonry, Inc et al
as 2:2007cv00872
Plaintiff:
Boards of Trustees of The Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs
Defendant:
Expert Masonry, Inc and Paul Brown
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
