Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Clark v. Ritchie et al
as 6:2022cv00034
Defendant:
Ralph Montula, Jason Ritchie, Amber Poindexter and others
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Clark and Michael Paul Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Huggins et al
as 4:2021cv02607
Plaintiff:
Erik Ivan Rivera
Defendant:
Gary Neal Huggins, Mark Nemeic, Alfredo Galindo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. Huggins et al
as 4:2021cv02417
Defendant:
Douglass Paul Clark, Gary Neal Huggins, Mark Nemeic and others
Plaintiff:
Erik Ivan Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kendall v. Washington Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv05502
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Kendall and Sabrina Marie Kendall
Defendant:
Washington Department of Corrections, Yakima County Department of Corrections, Steven Sinclair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gable v. Washington Corrections Center for Women et al
as 3:2018cv05266
Plaintiff:
Michelle C Gable
Defendant:
Washington Corrections Center for Women, Jo Wofford, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beene v. Heflin et al
as 3:2015cv00112
Plaintiff:
Craig Beene
Defendant:
Tina Heflin, f/n/u Avory, f/n/u Phillipee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Craniac
as 3:2008cv01928
Plaintiff:
Eric Paul Clark
Defendant:
Property Sgt. Craniac
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Clark v. Popson et al
as 3:2007cv02326
Plaintiff:
Eric Paul Clark
Defendant:
Lt. Popson and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Commonwealth of PA
as 3:2007cv01263
Plaintiff:
Eric Paul Clark
Defendant:
Commonwealth of PA and Stritz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
as 3:2007cv00791
Petitioner:
Eric Paul Clark
Respondent:
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
