Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Lettieri v. Matson et al
as 3:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Karen Matson, The Broome County Humane Society, David Gaska and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alan v. IRS et al
as 6:2024cv06076
Plaintiff:
David P. Alan
Defendant:
IRS, U.S. Atty. David J. Hickton, Assist. U.S. Atty. Paul E. Hull and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Bonanro
as 1:2023cv01307
Petitioner:
David C. Lettieri
Respondent:
Paul E. Bonanro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lettieri v. Quinn et al
as 1:2023cv07830
Plaintiff:
David Carmine Lettieri
Defendant:
James Quinn, Michael J. Romer, Lawrence Joseph Vilardo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Bonanno
as 1:2023cv01081
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Paul E. Bonanno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Bonanno et al
as 6:2023cv06515
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Paul E. Bonanno and Lawrence Joseph Vilardo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruggiero v. Jones et al
as 7:2023cv07157
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ruggiero
Defendant:
Stefanie E. Jones, Kevin C. Eschmann, Paul E. Julien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2023cv00749
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Federal Buearu of Investigation, Wyoming County Sheriffs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Bonanno
as 1:2022cv00927
Petitioner:
David C. Lettieri
Respondent:
Paul E. Bonanno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lettieri v. Bonanno
as 1:2022cv00926
Petitioner:
David C. Lettieri
Respondent:
Paul E. Bonanno
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
