Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01620
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SRINIVASAN v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2008cv01014
Plaintiff:
SRIDHARAN SRINIVASAN
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III, JONATHAN SCHARFEN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Xue, et al v. Chertoff, et al
as 3:2008cv00020
Plaintiff:
Yuming Xue and Ningning Wang
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Michael Mukasey, Emelio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
JEE v. CHERTOFF et al
as 1:2008cv00552
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMAD A. GULL JEE
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, ROBERT S. MUELLER, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv10510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SAEED et al v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv01294
Plaintiff:
TAHIR SAEED, NAILA SAEED and DANYALL SAEED
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, MICHAEL L. AYTES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
DUBEY v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2008cv00419
Plaintiff:
SIDDHARTH DUBEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00937
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
VARADHAN v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2008cv00296
Plaintiff:
RAJESH ARASANAPALAI VARADHAN
Defendant:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, ROBERT S. MUELLER, III, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
