Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Tripati v. Carter, et al.
as 24-2191
Plaintiff:
ANANT KUMAR TRIPATI
Defendant:
PAUL EDWARD CARTER, ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL, UNKNOWN CARTER, MICHAEL EVAN GOTTFRIED and others
Tripati v. Carter et al
as 2:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
Anant Kumar Tripati
Defendant:
Paul Edward Carter, Unknown Carter, Michael Evan Gottfried and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TRIPATI v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00427
Defendant:
KRISTIN WHITNEY BASHA, LUCY M. RAUD, NICHOLAS D. ALEDO and others
Plaintiff:
ANANT KUMAR TRIPATI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Anant Tripati v. Corizon Incorporated, et al
as 20-15593
Defendant / Appellee:
AKUASI ARHIN, Dr., KARYN E. KLAUSNER, ADOC Attorney, STEVEN BELL, CO III and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANANT KUMAR TRIPATI
Anant Tripati v. USDC-AZP
as 20-70366
Not Classified By Court:
JOSEPH SCOTT CONLON, Corizon Lawyer, PHYLLIS RANEY, Corizon Employee - Florence, Tempe, MEGHAN QUEEN, Trinity employee Florence and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, PHOENIX
Petitioner:
ANANT KUMAR TRIPATI
Tripati v. Corizon Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv03313
Defendant:
Kristin Whitney Basha, Paul Edward Carter, Charles Stedman Hover, III and others
Plaintiff:
Anant Kumar Tripati
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anant Tripati v. Corizon, Inc., et al
as 18-16446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANANT KUMAR TRIPATI
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON, INC., Health Care Provider, ADOC, CALVIN JOHNSON, Doctor/Policy Maker, Corizon-Tennessee, LUCY BURCIAGA, Doctor/Policy Maker, Corizon-Tucson and others
Tripati v. Corizon Incorporated et al
as 4:2018cv00066
Plaintiff:
Anant Kumar Tripati
Defendant:
Corizon Incorporated, Calvin Johnson, B Anderson Flatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tripati v. Carter et al
as 4:2014cv02077
Plaintiff:
Anant Kumar Tripati
Defendant:
Paul Edward Carter, Mark Pullichio, Nona Camek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
