Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Manetirony Clervrain, et al v. Paul Farrow, et al
as 22-1362
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN and FRANCIS C. OSEI-FOSU
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL FARROW, JESSE GARZA, KATIE MCCALLUM and others
Manetirony Clervrain, et al v. Paul Farrow, et al
as 22-1241
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN and FRANCIS C. OSEI-FOSU
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL FARROW, JESSE GARZA, KATIE MCCALLUM and others
Clervrain, Manetirony et al v. Farrow, Paul et al
as 3:2021cv00819
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu
Defendant:
Paul Farrow, Gerard Randall, Jesse Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
FARROW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv50282
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL FARROW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Farrow Jr v. Department of Human Services
as 2:2019cv02246
Respondent:
Department of Human Services
Petitioner:
Paul Farrow, Jr
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Farrow v. Vice et al
as 2:2019cv02239
Defendant:
John Doe, D Vice and Kay Young
Plaintiff:
Paul Farrow, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan et al v. Williams et al
as 2:2019cv02143
Defendant:
Shayne Cassidy, Dennis Gardner, Michael Maria and others
Plaintiff:
William Morgan and Paul Farrow, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farrow et al v. Hartshorn et al
as 2:2019cv02109
Defendant:
Nursing Department, Danville Police Department, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Farrow and William M Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Farrow, Jr. v. Harold Baker
as 09-2859
Petitioner:
PAUL FARROW, JR.
Respondent:
HAROLD A. BAKER
Party-in-Interest:
RYAN SCHULL, GREG PHILLIPS, KEVIN GETTZELMAN and others
Farrow v. Schull et al
as 2:2008cv02166
Plaintiff:
Paul Farrow
Defendant:
Ryan Schull, Greg Phillips, Kevin Gettzelman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
