Cases 21 - 30 of 59
Crowley v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2014cv00166
Defendant:
Unknown Party, Paul R Babeu, Jason Riggs and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Jay Crowley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Day v. Babeu et al
as 2:2013cv02633
Defendant:
Paul R Babeu, Levi Adamson, S Lennon and others
Plaintiff:
Cary Jay O'Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cristobal Hernandez, Jr. v. Janice Brewer, et al
as 13-16826
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRISTOBAL HERNANDEZ, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
JANICE K. BREWER, Governor of the State of Arizona, in her official capacity, THOMAS C. HORNE, Arizona Attorney General, in his official and individual capacities, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Walker v. Babeu et al
as 2:2013cv01835
Plaintiff:
Ryan Eugene Walker
Defendant:
Paul R Babeu, Pinal County Adult Detention Center, K Rodelguz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rokosiga v. Zelenka et al
as 2:2013cv01738
Defendant:
Martin F Zelenka, Jon M Gurule, Paul R Babeu and others
Plaintiff:
Savenaca Mikaele Rokosiga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Hara v. Babeu et al
as 2:2013cv01708
Plaintiff:
Shawn O'Hara
Defendant:
Paul R Babeu, Unknown Apone, William Dorman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Botes v. Babeu et al
as 2:2013cv01601
Plaintiff:
Andries Stephanus Botes
Defendant:
Paul R Babeu, Unknown Delgado, Unknown Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01317
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tanzer v. Babeu
as 2:2013cv01118
Plaintiff:
Mark Joseph Hills Tanzer
Defendant:
Paul R Babeu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tanzer v. Babeu
as 2:2013cv01089
Plaintiff:
Mark Joseph Hills Tanzer
Defendant:
Paul R Babeu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
