Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Thomas Richard, Sr. v. Superintendent Graterford SCI, et al
as 17-1394
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS PAUL RICHARD, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT GRATERFORD SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY WESTMORELAND COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Thomas Richard, Sr. v. Superintendent Graterford SCI, et al
as 16-1691
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS PAUL RICHARD, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT GRATERFORD SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY WESTMORELAND COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Thomas Richard, Sr. v. Superintendent Graterford SCI, et al
as 15-1929
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS PAUL RICHARD, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT GRATERFORD SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY WESTMORELAND COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Richard et al v. City of Port Barre et al
as 6:2014cv02427
Plaintiff:
Connie Richard , Charles Nevills , Cijie Nevills and others
Defendant:
City of Port Barre, Police Dept of Port Barre, Deon Boudreaux Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Richard, Sr. v. Warden Graterford SCI, et al
as 14-1075
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS PAUL RICHARD, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN GRATERFORD SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY WESTMORELAND COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
In re: Thomas Richard, Sr.
as 13-2384
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS PAUL RICHARD, SR.
Defendant - Respondent:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, DISTRICT ATTORNEY WESTMORELAND COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Nominal Respondent:
ROBERT C. MITCHELL
In re: Thomas Paul Richard, Sr.
as 12-3876
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS PAUL RICHARD, SR.
Defendant - Respondent:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ
Richards v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2012cv00832
Plaintiff:
Gene Paul Richards, Sr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Richards v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2012cv00288
Plaintiff:
Gene Paul Richards, Sr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
