Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Sewell et al v. Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans et al
as 2:2015cv03117
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Sewell , George Duessing , William Sewell and others
Defendant:
Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans
Third_party_plaintiff:
Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans
Third_party_defendant:
B&K Construction Co., LLC , Cajun Constructors, LLC , Boh Brothers Construction Co., LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Payne et al v. Eagle U S 2 L L C et al
as 2:2015cv00725
Plaintiff:
Angoe Payne , Michael Pitre , Richard W Pitre and others
Defendant:
Eagle U S 2 L L C and David L Ardoin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richard et al v. City of Port Barre et al
as 6:2014cv02427
Plaintiff:
Connie Richard , Charles Nevills , Cijie Nevills and others
Defendant:
City of Port Barre, Police Dept of Port Barre, Deon Boudreaux Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown et al v. Great Southern Oil & Gas Co Inc et al
as 6:2013cv00301
Plaintiff:
Gussie Brown , Mitchell G Prudhomme , Ramona Amelia Smith and others
Defendant:
Hilcorp Energy Co , Great Southern Oil & Gas Co Inc , Vintage Petroleum L L C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Smith v. 30th Judicial District Court et al
as 2:2012cv00285
Plaintiff:
Paul Richard Bryan Smith
Defendant:
District Attorney's Office 30th Judicial District Court, Sheriffs Office Vernon Parish, Dept of Corrections Probation and Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. District Attorney et al
as 3:2012cv00314
Plaintiff:
Paul Richard Bryan Smith
Defendant:
Office of District Attorney and Police Detectives Leesville City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith v. District Attorney et al
as 2:2012cv00314
Plaintiff:
Paul Richard Bryan Smith
Defendant:
Office of District Attorney and Police Detectives Leesville City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
