Cases 11 - 20 of 21
David Wolf v. S. Harrington, et al
as 12-20282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID PAUL WOLF, also known as David Benard Wolf
Defendant - Appellee:
S. HARRINGTON, University of Texas Medical Branch, Practice Manager, L VATANI, Physician Assistant, University of Texas Medical Branch, AVELA, Dr. Physician, Pack Infirmary and others
David Wolf v. N. Webb, et al
as 12-40392
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID PAUL WOLF
Defendant - Appellee:
N WEBB, Assistant Warden, UNKNOWN KAZMIERCZAK, UNKNOWN BLACK and others
Lena v. The United States District Court for the Northern District of California et al
as 3:2012cv01354
Plaintiff:
Michael Angelo Lena
Respondent:
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Eugene Lynch, Steven Frecerro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wolf v. Thaler, et al
as 4:2012cv00767
Plaintiff:
David Paul Wolf
Defendant:
Rick Thaler, Fausto Avilla, Sarah J Abke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Wolf v. N. Webb, et al
as 12-40007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID PAUL WOLF
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN KAZMIERCZAK, UNKNOWN BLACK and UNKNOWN OWEN
Wolf v. Harrington et al
as 4:2011cv03492
Plaintiff:
David Paul Wolf
Defendant:
S Harrington, L Vatani, Avela and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolf v. Parole Board of Illinois
as 1:2011cv01213
Plaintiff:
Paul Wolf
Defendant:
Parole Board of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolf v. Webb et al
as 6:2011cv00255
Plaintiff:
David Paul Wolf
Defendant:
N Webb, Unknown Kazmierczak, Unknown Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolf v. Rudd et al
as 6:2010cv00381
Plaintiff:
David Paul Wolf
Defendant:
Robecca Rudd, Lannette Linthicum, Owen Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolf v. Quarterman
as 6:2008cv00016
Petitioner:
David Paul Wolf
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
