Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Bey v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2023cv00477
Plaintiff:
Darius Johnson Bey
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Arizona Department of Administration - Risk Management Division, City of Phoenix Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv01221
Plaintiff:
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission
Defendant:
United States, Merrick B Garland, Mary Murguia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Higgins et al v. Higgins
as 2:2022cv00283
Defendant:
Mark Rock Higgins, Sean Rick Higgins, Tyron Rock Higgins and others
Plaintiff:
Higgins Family Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Muhammad v. Ryan et al
as 3:2016cv08264
Plaintiff:
Riki Rashaad Muhammad
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Heather Richardson, Cheryl Dossett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. Peace Wellness Center PLLC et al
as 2:2015cv00534
Plaintiff:
Shandra Kelly
Defendant:
Peace Wellness Center PLLC, Timothy S Peace and Unknown Peace
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00966
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
O'Hines v. California Corr. Peace Officer Assoc., et al
as 2:2008cv00809
Plaintiff:
James Lynn O'Hines
Defendant:
California Corr. Peace Officer Assoc., Bakersfield, City of, Santa Barbara, City of and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hines v. Correctional Officer Union et al
as 2:2008cv00654
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Union, Arizona Peace Officer Association Union, CCPOA and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hines v. Stringfellow et al
as 2:2007cv00180
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Defendant:
Stringfellow, Pamela Larry Hissong, Police Depts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
