Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Pedro Ramos-Reues v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-70967
Petitioner:
PEDRO RAMOS-REUES
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
RAMOS-LARA v. DECKER et al
as 2:2011cv01995
Petitioner:
PEDRO RAMOS-LARA
Respondent:
THOMAS R. DECKER , JOHN P. TORRES , JANET NAPOLITANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lind-Hernandez et al v. Hospital Episcopal San Lucas Guayama et al
as 3:2011cv01278
Plaintiff:
Joel Lind-Hernandez and Nilda Esther Lind-Hernandez
Defendant:
Hospital Episcopal San Lucas Guayama, Hospital Episcopal Cristo Redentor, Pedro Ramos-Canseco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Pedro Ramos v. City of Chicago, et al
as 10-3425
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PEDRO RAMOS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, JOHN STANLEY, Officer, #9024, JIM JOHNSON, #12758 and others
Ramos v. Holt et al
as 4:2010cv00681
Petitioner:
Pedro Ramos
Respondent:
Ronnie Holt and Northeast Regional Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pedro Ramos, et al v. Fritz Newman, et al
as 09-56981
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PEDRO RAMOS, as an individual and as Guardian Ad Litem for K.R., minor, CATALINA RAMOS, as an individual and as Guardian Ad Litem for K.R., minor and THE FAIR HOUSING COUNSEL OF SAN DIEGO, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
FRITZ NEWMAN, DBA El Camino 76 Mobile Estates, G. N. SELLERS, III, DBA N.A.P. Consulting Inc. and ADELE TEAL
Ramos v. Astrue
as 2:2009cv00392
Plaintiff:
Pedro Ramos, Jr
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue and Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ramos v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2009cv01058
Plaintiff:
Pedro Ramos
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Stanley, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
