Cases
Yu v. Stuart
as 4:2025cv03874
Petitioner: Peng Yu
Respondent: Kevin Stuart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Yu v. Unknown
as 3:2025cv00635
Plaintiff: Peng Yu
Defendant: Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv02234
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Yu v. Warden
as 1:2025cv06084
Petitioner: Peng Yu
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Yu v. State of Texas
as 25-20159
Plaintiff: Peng Yu
Defendant: State of Texas
Yu v. State of Texas We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv05070
Plaintiff: Peng Yu
Defendant: State Of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Merch Traffic, LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv05316
Defendant: bolin shop, baoifazhan, caohuining and others
Plaintiff: Merch Traffic, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Khara Inc. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2022cv00171
Plaintiff: Khara Inc. and Ground Works Co., Ltd.
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", A dandelion, A papaya and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Burberry Limited, a United Kingdom corporation et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2015cv02851
Plaintiff: Burberry Limited, a United Kingdom corporation and Burberry Limited, a New York corporation
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Su Sheng, Chen Zhenquan, Ming Cheng Lin, and Owen Wu, collectively d/b/a YYW.COM and NEXT [YYW] and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?