Cases 31 - 40 of 337
Perez v. Ransome et al
as 1:2022cv01087
Plaintiff:
Francisco Perez
Defendant:
Superintendent Kevin Ransome, SCI Dallas Medical Department, Bureau of Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. LOMBARDO et al
as 1:2022cv04404
Plaintiff:
CAROLE MAE MARSHALL
Defendant:
WARDEN DONALD J LOMBARDO, CAPTAIN MAYQUIL, LT. CAMBELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Sage
as 1:2022cv01028
Petitioner:
Efrain Perez
Respondent:
Warden Sage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Perez v. Reese et al
as 3:2022cv01021
Plaintiff:
Mark Perez
Defendant:
Captain R. Reese, Officer John Doe and Captain J. Newberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Javier Perez
as 22-2135
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
JAVIER PEREZ
Panchigar v. Price et al
as 1:2022cv00748
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Panchigar
Defendant:
Corporal Price and Lieutenant Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jairo v. United States et al
as 3:2022cv00818
Plaintiff:
Perez Jairo
Defendant:
United States, J. Meyers, National Gang Unit Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Chach v. United States et al
as 3:2022cv00773
Plaintiff:
Minor Perez Chach
Defendant:
United States, J. Meyers, National Gang Unit Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
OCHOA-PEREZ v. QUEEN
as 3:2022cv00081
Petitioner:
RAUL OCHOA-PEREZ
Respondent:
QUEEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Vasquez v. United States et al
as 3:2022cv00813
Plaintiff:
Noe S. Perez Vasquez
Defendant:
United States, J. Meyers, National Gang Unit Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
