Cases 11 - 20 of 6,010
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01344
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
LOPEZ PEREZ v. GARLAND et al
as 2:2024cv03954
Plaintiff:
ANDY ROMAN LOPEZ PEREZ
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, Alexandro N Mayorkas, Director UR M JADDOU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Evans #078208 v. Thornhill-Garrison et al
as 2:2024cv01076
Plaintiff:
Ira Deland Evans
Defendant:
Julynne Thornhill-Garrison, Eve Kelemen and Unknown Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
P. et al v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02828
Plaintiff:
D.P.U, D. M. P., Annie Pompa Morejon and others
Defendant:
Beech-Nut Nutrition Company, Inc., Gerber Products Company, Plum PBC doing business as Plum Organics and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Perez-Perez v. Garland et al
as 3:2024cv00839
Petitioner:
Carlos Alberto Perez-Perez
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, Ronald L. Davis, Steven C. Stafford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Camacho Perez v. Garland
as 24-2971
Petitioner:
MILTON CAMACHO PEREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Perez-Briceno v. Garland
as 24-2980
Petitioner:
JUNIESKA CAROLINA PEREZ-BRICENO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Perez v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-2943
Petitioner:
LISA MARIE PEREZ and Lisa Marie Belyew
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Interested Party:
LARRY LORMAN, COLUSA POLICE DEPARTMENT and MATT BEAUCHAMP
Perez v. Macias et al
as 4:2024cv02725
Plaintiff:
Avaro Covarrubias Perez
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Macias, Correctional Officer L.Lopez, C. Koening and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
