Cases 1 - 10 of 86
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Murphy v. Aramark Food Service and Facilities Management, East Carolina University et al
as 4:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
Larry F. Murphy
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service and Facilities Management, East Carolina University, ARAMARK Campus, LLC, Kelvin Tarakwasha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Vail-Perez v. USA
as 5:2023cv00545
Petitioner:
Mynor Romeo Vail-Perez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Perez v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01332
Plaintiff:
Tom Perez
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Perez Gonzalez v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023hc02190
Petitioner:
Julio Cesar Perez Gonzalez
Respondent:
Warden William Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Perez v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00599
Plaintiff:
Fatima M. Perez
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Julio v. Immigration & Customs Enforcement
as 5:2023hc02056
Petitioner:
Perez G. Julio and Julio G. Perez
Respondent:
Immigration & Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cherenfant v. FCC Butner Wardens et al
as 5:2023ct03023
Plaintiff:
Nertant Cherenfant
Defendant:
FCC Butner Wardens, FCI 2 Butner, Warden Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Flores-Espinoza v. Jeffrey C. Lee Farms, Inc., et al
as 5:2022cv00279
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Flores-Espinoza
Defendant:
Jeffrey C. Lee Farms, Inc. and Bernardo Perez
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
