Cases 61 - 70 of 140
Perez v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation et al
as 3:2017cv03187
Plaintiff:
Nancy C. Perez
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation and Holly Gillespie Pisarik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 9:2017cv02402
Plaintiff:
Yenaris Cruz Perez
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv02017
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Quinn v. Tyson Sales and Distribution Inc et al
as 0:2017cv01639
Plaintiff:
Dottie Quinn
Defendant:
Tyson Sales and Distribution Inc and Rhonda Kay Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quinn v. Tyson Sales and Distribution Inc et al
as 0:2017cv01640
Plaintiff:
Grover James Quinn
Defendant:
Tyson Sales and Distribution Inc and Rhonda Kay Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bessie Barringer et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03992
Plaintiff:
Bessie Barringer , Reeshemah Adams , Sarah Bales and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Perez v. City of Charleston Police Department et al
as 2:2016cv03677
Plaintiff:
Jesse Perez
Defendant:
City of Charleston Police Department , Charleston, City of , Gregory Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez-Perez v. Ray et al
as 9:2016cv03574
Plaintiff:
Crescencio Perez-Perez
Defendant:
M E Ray, C E Floyd, E Rain Water and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Breese v. Perez et al
as 7:2016cv03123
Plaintiff:
Dana Faye Breese
Defendant:
Librado Manuel Perez and Transportes Regiomontanos Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aleman-Perez v. USA
as 3:2016cv02184
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Raul Aleman-Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
