Cases 1 - 10 of 11
ABCM Corporation v. Fudge Broadwater, P.A. et al
as 4:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
ABCM Corporation
Defendant:
Fudge Broadwater, P.A., Donna Fudge, William Benjamin Broadwater and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv00667
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
NAPOLEON v. HAN
as 2:2015cv00200
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL NAPOLEON
Defendant:
PETER HAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kickstart Motorsports, Inc. et al v. AMCO Insurance Company
as 2:2014cv02727
Counter Claimant:
AMCO Insurance Company
Defendant:
AMCO Insurance Company
Counter Defendant:
Peter Han and Kickstart Motorsports, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Peter Han and Kickstart Motorsports, Inc.
Kickstart Motorsports, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02724
Movant:
Peter Han and Kickstart Motorsports, Inc.
BMW of North America LLC et al v. Dynamic Performance Wheels, Inc et al
as 8:2013cv01222
Plaintiff:
BMW of North America LLC and Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
Defendant:
Does, Dynamic Performance Wheels, Inc, Chihchi Peter Han and others
Lazo Chabla v. Queens Health Food Emporium, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00676
Movant:
Peter Hans Cooper
Plaintiff:
Segundo Alfredo Lazo Chabla
Defendant:
Queens Health Food Emporium, Inc. and Sally Tseng
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Han v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Company NV
as 4:2010cv00923
Plaintiff:
Peter Han
Defendant:
Chicago Bridge & Iron Company NV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Suh et al v. Cho et al
as 1:2010cv00437
Plaintiff:
Min S. Suh and Angela Suh
Defendant:
Jason Cho and Peter Han
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
KETTENHOFEN et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv84989
Plaintiff:
PETER HANS ULRICH and PATRICIA ULRICH
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION, CERTAIN TEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
