Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Antar v. Lodice et al
as 3:2025cv00582
Respondent:
Matthew John Lodice, Gerald Viglione, Jr., State of Connecticut and others
Petitioner:
Theodora F. Antar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Samuel Blake v. Canoo Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00739
Plaintiff:
Samuel Blake
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Jeff Tyler and Justin Kojak
Defendant:
Canoo Inc., Tony Aquila, Ulrich Kranz and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Daniel J. Hennessy, Nicholas A. Petruska, Bradley Bell and others
Petitioner:
James Baber, Jeffrey Paljevic, Carl Shupe and others
SHEA v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv11637
Plaintiff:
PETER SHEA
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Patterson v. Hennessy et al
as 1:2021cv00907
Nominal Defendant:
Canoo Inc.
Plaintiff:
Claude L. Patterson and Hennessy Capital Acqusition Corp. IV
Defendant:
Ulrich Kranz, Gretchen W. McClain, Paul Balciunas and others
Justin Kojak v. Canoo Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02879
Defendant:
Canoo Inc., James F. ONeil III, Nicholas A. Petruska and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Kojak
Schuman v. Hennessy Capital Acquisition Corp. IV et al
as 1:2020cv10175
Defendant:
Richard Burns, Peter Shea, Hennessy Capital Acquisition Corp. IV and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Schuman
Kenneth Newkirk v. General Assembly
as 16-7480
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant - Appellee:
GENERAL ASSEMBLY, SUPREME COURT, TERRY MCAULIFFE, Governor and others
Kenneth Newkirk v. Artisha Gregg
as 16-6623
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant - Appellee:
ARTISHA GREGG, Hampton Commonwealth of Virginia, MR. HUFF, Chief Judge, MR. DECKER, Judge and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
