Cases 1 - 10 of 1,367
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Davis Jr. v. Jose Chapa Law Firm
as 4:2024cv01561
Plaintiff:
Peter Davis Jr.
Defendant:
Jose Chapa Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
v. Taylor et al
as 4:2024cv01571
Plaintiff:
James C. Mastandrea
Defendant:
David Taylor, Jack Mahaffey, Jeff Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Riley v. McNally
as 1:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Peter Riley
Defendant:
Donna McNally
Guardian Ad Litem:
Glenn M. Karisch and Eryn Lyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Okunoghae v. USA
as 5:2024cv00054
Petitioner:
Osazuwa Peter Okunoghae
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Gonzalez v. Carmona et al
as 3:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Gonzalez, Jr.
Defendant:
Julio Carmona, Peter Torres, Juan Palafox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peters v. Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice
as 3:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Peters
Defendant:
Texas Dept. of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vasquez v. Ho et al
as 5:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Jaime Noel Vasquez
Defendant:
Peter Ho and Texas Tech Mental Health Providers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips et al v. County Of Smith et al Case electronically transferred to Eastern District of Texas-Tyler.
as 6:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Derek-Lee Phillips and Cody-Storm Voss
Respondent:
County of Smith, Johnathan Peters, Riley Rugg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
