Cases 21 - 30 of 320
SMITH v. MCKINNEY et al
as 2:2022cv02983
Plaintiff:
DANIEL R SMITH
Defendant:
STEPHEN S. MCKINNEY, DANIEL J. STICKNEY JR., FRANCIS D. PETERSON JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooper v. Knapp et al
as 1:2022cv00997
Plaintiff:
Jamil Cooper
Defendant:
Unit Manager Knapp, Richard Ellers, Corrections Officer Chicolite and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITFIELD v. PREFERRED APARTMENT COMMUNITIES, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01542
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
PREFERRED APPARTMENT COMMUNITIES, INC., JOEL T MURPHY, HOWARD A MCLURE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
SMITH v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
as 2:2022cv00529
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY TUSWEET SMITH
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, JENNIFER ANNE PETERSON-BUCK, LINDA H. BARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson, III v. McGinley et al
as 1:2022cv00283
Petitioner:
Willie Peterson, III
Respondent:
Thomas McGinley and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PETERSON v. AUTOZONE, INC.
as 2:2021cv05217
Plaintiff:
VINCENT PETERSON
Defendant:
AUTOZONE, INC.
3Rd Party Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
PETERSON v. WATSON et al
as 2:2021cv04669
Plaintiff:
ALEX PETERSON
Defendant:
C/O/ KEISHA WATSON, C/O/ JOHN DOE ELBY and C/O/ JOHN DOE 2 KENNIZAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2021cv03752
Plaintiff:
JESSICA PETERSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
IN RE: GARRY W. ROBINSON
as 2:2021cv03323
In Re:
GARRY W. ROBINSON and GREGORY PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
