Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Croney v. Deamoru et al
as 9:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
Norman Croney
Defendant:
Michael Deamoru, Dannielle Medburry, Sgt Yeager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adamson v. Reardon et al
as 9:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
David Antonio Adamson
Defendant:
Patrick Reardon, David DeBejian, E. Pfendler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pfendler v. Saul
as 6:2020cv00702
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Christine A. Pfendler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
PFENDLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv59820
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW PFENDLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chavis v. McCulloch et al
as 9:2020cv00435
Defendant:
S. Gillani, M. Rushford, A. Tousignant and others
Plaintiff:
George Chavis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abreu v. Dougherty
as 19-586
Defendant / Appellee:
Mr. Garza, OMH Clinician Social Worker at Marcy Correctional Facility/RMHU, Mr. Sanatoro, OMH Clinician Social Worker at Marcy Correctional Facility/RMHU, L. Collins, Deputy Superintendent for Security, Marcy Correctional Facility and others
Defendant:
Mr. Venettozzi, William Dawson, Director of Correctional Dental Services, DOCCS, Miller, Superintendent, Great Meadow Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carlos Abreu
PFENDLER v. PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
as 2:2018cv00361
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE PFENDLER
Defendant:
PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hester v. Thomas, et al
as 9:2016cv01350
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hester
Defendant:
J. Thomas, Officer Tuttle, S. Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-16916
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
