Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Jason Tyrrell, et al v. Richard Robinson, et al
as 24-1266
Plaintiff:
JASON ALAN TYRRELL and ALVIN DWAYNE FRAZIER
Defendant:
RICHARD LEE ROBINSON, WILLIAM CHARLES VALKEMA, CRESTON JEROME HICKS and others
Bowman v. Chambless et al
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Hywel C. Bowman
Defendant:
Michael Chambless, Abby Cassady, Geoffrey Gleitz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thacker v. Phelps et al
as 5:2023cv00077
Plaintiff:
Sheila Dianne Thacker
Defendant:
Jody Phelps, Shauna, Christy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Warden, Grafton Correction Institution
as 2:2023cv01697
Petitioner:
Robert Phelps
Respondent:
Warden, Grafton Correction Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Adams v. Kemp, et al
as 23-1397
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES R. ADAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
LAW LIBRARIAN KEMP and A. PHELPS
Adams #823706 v. Kemp et al
as 2:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
James Adams #823706
Defendant:
Unknown Kemp and A. Phelps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. North Central Ohio Rehabilitation Center et al
as 3:2022cv01671
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
North Central Ohio Rehabilitation Center, Travis B. Stillion, Inder F. Levesque and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Witt v. Saint Joseph Health System, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv00102
Executor:
Samara Witt
Defendant:
Saint Joseph Health System, Inc., Commonspirit Health, Inc., Ofc. Logan Medlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. USA
as 6:2022cv00098
Petitioner:
Rodney Scott Phelps
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Justin Phelps v. USA
as 22-5301
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUSTIN KYLE PHELPS
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
