Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Phelps v. O'Toole et al
as 1:2010cv10071
Plaintiff:
Coy Phelps
Defendant:
George A. O'Toole, Marilyn H Patel and Other Unnamed Justices,Judges and Magistrate Judges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Phelps v. Holder, et al
as 09-2542
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COY PHELPS
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY LAPPIN, CAROLYN A. SABOL, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES LOCAL NO. 0222, AFL-CIO, f/k/a Unknown Federal Employees Labor Unions and others
Phelps v. Grondolsky
as 1:2009cv11735
Petitioner:
Coy Phelps
Respondent:
Jeffrey Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Phelps v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv11591
Petitioner:
Coy Phelps
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Phelps v. Grondolsky
as 1:2009cv11485
Plaintiff:
Coy Phelps
Respondent:
J Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Phelps v. Haas, et al
as 09-2038
Petitioner - Appellant:
COY PHELPS
Respondent - Appellee:
HOWARD HAAS and DAVID WINN
Phelps v. Local 0222 et al
as 1:2009cv11218
Plaintiff:
Coy Phelps
Defendant:
Local 0222, American Federation of Government Employees AFL-C10, ATS Corporation (Trulinks/Trufone) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Phelps v. Sabol
as 4:2009cv40091
Petitioner:
Coy Phelps
Respondent:
Carolyn Sabol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Phelps v. Sabol
as 1:2009cv10557
Plaintiff:
Coy Phelps
Defendant:
Carolyn Sabol
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Fishman Haygood Phelps Walmsley, Willis & Swanson, L.L.P. v. State Street Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv10533
Plaintiff:
Fishman Haygood Phelps Walmsley, Willis & Swanson, L.L.P.
Defendant:
State Street Corporation, State Street Bank & Trust Co., State Street Bank & Trust Co. of New Hampshire and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
