Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Association Insurance Company et al v. Schwab Design Builders, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv01398
Defendant:
Phil Kline, Schwab Design Builders, Inc. and Kelly Kline
Plaintiff:
Association Insurance Company and American Builders Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Buffington v. Rohling, et al
as 08-3252
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT LEE BUFFINGTON
Respondent - Appellee:
KAREN ROHLING, Warden of Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS, Phil Kline
Robbins v. City of Johnson County et al
as 5:2008cv03180
Plaintiff:
Dennis Robbins
Defendant:
City of Johnson County, City of Olathe, Phil Kline and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hester v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2008cv03434
Plaintiff:
Markita Hester
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Phil Kline, Matthew Tobias and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
In re: Lisa Jane Graham, et al
as 08-3051
Petitioner:
In re: LISA JANE GRAHAM
Respondent:
RICHARD KOERNER, Warden, Topeka Correctional Facility and PHIL KLINE
Pierce v. Rohling et al
as 5:2007cv01405
Petitioner:
Christopher Pierce
Respondent:
Karen Rohling and Phil Kline
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carlill v. Kline et al
as 2:2007cv02496
Plaintiff:
Fred Carlill
Defendant:
Phil Kline and Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reed v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2007cv04854
Plaintiff:
Kevin Reed
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Kaniz, Kevin Lockett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlill v. Kline et al
as 5:2007cv03216
Plaintiff:
Fred Carlill
Defendant:
Phil Kline and Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCormick v. Kline, et al
as 07-3213
Petitioner - Appellant:
DALE E. MCCORMICK
Respondent - Appellee:
PHIL KLINE, Attorney General and DAVID R. MCKUNE, Warden, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
