Cases 1 - 10 of 15
SEBOLT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv00009
Plaintiff:
PHILIP M. SEBOLT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEBOLT v. TYNDALL et al
as 2:2019cv00429
Defendant:
ROYER, MONETT, WASSON and others
Plaintiff:
PHILIP M. SEBOLT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sebolt v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv01165
Plaintiff:
Philip M. Sebolt
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Philip Sebolt v. USA
as 18-2056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILIP M. SEBOLT
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SEBOLT v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2018cv00088
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and S. MORIN
Plaintiff:
PHILIP M. SEBOLT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sebolt v. Pindelski et al
as 1:2017cv01212
Plaintiff:
Philip M. Sebolt
Defendant:
John A. Pindelski, Stephanie K. Rush, Andres E. Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Philip Sebolt v. Charles Samuels, Jr., et al
as 17-2845
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILIP M. SEBOLT
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director, Director of FBOP; is sued in his individual and official capacities, MELISSA J. BAYLESS, Former Unit Manager of D-Unit, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, Former Director of BOP; sued in his individual capacity and others
Sebolt v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv03866
Plaintiff:
Philip M. Sebolt
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SEBOLT v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2017cv00105
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and CLINT SWIFT
Plaintiff:
PHILIP M. SEBOLT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SEBOLT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv00028
Plaintiff:
PHILIP M. SEBOLT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
